The Ashebo Method

A unified theoretical framework that derives Newton's gravitational constant G from first principles — with zero free parameters and 0.064% accuracy. Spanning particle physics, emergent gravity, and cosmic evolution.

Resonance Valley Visualization
Featured Paper

Vacuum Strain and the Yang-Mills Mass Gap

A physical mechanism from gluon condensation — the nonzero gluon condensate induces persistent strain in the quantum vacuum, producing the mass gap with zero free parameters. Predicts m = 1.65 ± 0.15 GeV vs. lattice value 1.71 ± 0.05 GeV.

Clay Millennium ProblemZero Free ParametersConfinement IncludedPreprint — February 2026

Core Mechanism

Effective Potential

V(φ) = (λ/4)φ⁴ − Jφ

Mass Gap

m² = 3λ1/3J2/3

Confinement

V(r) = σr, σ ≈ (440 MeV)²

Both λ and J derived from QCD — no fitting

Preprint — February 2026

Vacuum Strain: Yang-Mills Mass Gap & the Origin of G

Two major unsolved problems — the Yang-Mills mass gap (Clay Millennium Problem) and the origin of Newton's G — emerge from a single mechanism: persistent vacuum strain induced by the gluon condensate. No free parameters. No extra dimensions.

Numerical Results

Mass gap (0++)1.65 GeV (3.5% error)
String tension √σ0.44 GeV (matches lattice)
Newton's G (predicted)6.670×10⁻¹¹ (vs. 6.674 observed, 0.064%)
Free parametersZERO
Extra dimensionsNONE (4D only)

How It Compares

String Theory10+ dimensions, no G prediction
Loop Quantum Gravity4D, no G prediction
Verlinde (Entropic)4D, qualitative only
Ashebo Framework4D, G to 0.064%

Smoking Gun Test

ΔG/G ≈ -3 Δα/α — If the fine-structure constant varies, G must vary proportionally. Falsifiable with current precision experiments.